Macros are the easy part.
Your client logged 1,840 calories and hit her protein. She is still exhausted at week six. Açaí reads 245 micronutrients from a single photo of her plate, so you can stop guessing and start pointing.
Free for you · No card · No per-client fee · 93 kcal benchmarked error
A macro log sees four numbers. Every weekly report reads 245.
Open the log. Scroll. Nothing looks wrong.
Chicken, rice, broccoli. Calories in range, protein hit, weight moving roughly as expected. She tells you she is tired, her sleep is poor, and the last two weeks have been hard. You look at the log again.
Nothing looks wrong, because nothing can look wrong. A calorie and macro log has three numbers in it. The answer to why she feels the way she does is not one of the three.
So you say the thing you say when the data cannot tell you anything: let us stay consistent and reassess next week.
Three steps, and only one of them is yours.
Step one, on her phoneShe photographs the plate
Nothing weighed, nothing searched, no barcode. Açaí identifies the ingredients, estimates the portions and returns the full nutrient profile in about three seconds.
Açaí reads all 245
The actual app, not a mockup. Every meal carries its own confidence score, and the week accumulates into one report per client while you get on with your day.
Step three, on your deskYou review, edit, release
The report waits for you. Change the wording, drop what does not fit, add what only you know about this client. Then it goes out, with your name on it.
Six things you stop doing by hand.
The part no macro tracker can show you.
Every nutrient is compared to its reference target and ranked by risk. Same client, same week, same photos: her calories and protein are fine, her vitamin D sits at 41 percent of target and her sodium at 124 percent of the limit.
- Every nutrient against its own reference target
- Ranked by risk, not printed alphabetically
- Repeat offenders surface week over week
Sample client, one weekOne report per client, every single week.
Built from the photos your client already takes, waiting for you before you open the chat. Every figure below is from the real sample report, not a mockup.
Four numbers, before you open the chat
Logging adherence, average intake, estimated deficit and protein. Enough to know in five seconds whether this week is worth a long reply.
You already know these people. Now you can see them.
The same weekly report answers a different question depending on who is in front of you. Pick one and watch the panel re-read the week.
Tap a client. The report panel re-reads the same week through their situation.
Exhausted at week six, and the log looks perfect.
Energy and protein are where you set them. Fiber, magnesium and potassium have been under target all week and sodium is over the limit. Nothing in a macro log would have shown you this.
If a client’s food log is part of your job, this is for you.
Dietitians
An ADIME-ready weekly note and 245 nutrients against reference targets, in intake language.
Personal trainers
See whether the nutrition is holding up the training, without becoming a food-diary nag.
Online coaches
You cannot see what a remote client eats between calls. A photo log closes that gap.
Clinics
Consistent weekly reporting across every practitioner, with per-client consent and an audit log.
No testimonials here yet. That is the point.
Açaí Professional is opening now, so we are not going to show you a wall of quotes from coaches who have used it for a year. What we can show you is the thing itself: a complete sample report, a published accuracy benchmark, and the guardrails written down where you can check them.
The founding cohort gets the product free, permanently, and a direct line to the people building it. When your clients’ reports tell you something a macro log never could, we would like to quote you on it.
93 kcal of error. Here is the benchmark.
Mean absolute error of 93 kcal per meal, about twice as accurate as ChatGPT and five times better than the weakest tool in the set. We publish the meal set, the method, and every competitor score, including the ones where we do not win by much.
Where a photo cannot carry the answer, the report says so. Vitamin D is flagged in the sample as low food reliability, consider labs, rather than reported as a clean number.
Read the full accuracy benchmarkNutrition Care Process / ADIME: Assessment, Diagnosis, Intervention, Monitoring & Evaluation.
Compare intake to appropriate DRI/DRV-style references; distinguish target, range, and upper limit.
Prefer measured RMR where available; otherwise transparent estimation (Mifflin-St Jeor or wearable resting energy) with caveats.
Support dietitian-set targets and AMDR-style ranges where appropriate.
Use “intake below target” or “possible inadequacy risk,” not a medical deficiency diagnosis.
Show confidence at meal and report level; never hide uncertain portions or low-confidence photo recognition.
Answered plainly, including the limits.
What does it cost me?+
Nothing. Açaí Professional is free for the coach. Your clients use the Açaí app, which has a free tier and a paid Premium tier, exactly as any other client of ours would. You are not billed per client and there is no seat fee.
How accurate is a photo, really?+
On our benchmark, Açaí's mean absolute error is 93 kcal per meal, roughly twice as accurate as ChatGPT and five times better than the weakest tools we tested. The full method, the meal set, and every competitor score are published on our accuracy page. Each meal in your report also carries its own confidence score, and low-confidence meals are flagged rather than averaged in silently.
Do my clients have to weigh or enter anything?+
No. They photograph the plate. That is the entire logging workflow, which is why adherence in the sample week is 90 percent rather than the drop-off you see by week two with written diaries.
Can the app give my client advice I did not approve?+
No. The report is drafted, then it stops. You review the risk flags and wording, edit the goals, and release it. Supplement, lab, diagnosis, pregnancy, pediatric, renal, diabetes, and medication-related guidance never reaches a client without your approval.
Does it diagnose deficiencies?+
No, and it is written specifically not to. The report says intake below reference target or possible dietary inadequacy risk. It never says diagnosed deficiency. Intake data cannot substitute for labs, symptoms, medication review, and history, and the report says so on the page where the flags appear.
What happens to my client's data?+
The client consents to sharing with you and can revoke it. Access is role-based, there is an audit log, and exports are available as PDF or CSV with sensitive-data controls.
Which nutrients are actually covered?+
245, covering vitamins, minerals, amino acids, fatty acids, and phytonutrients. The weekly report surfaces the ones that moved or crossed a threshold rather than printing all 245 at you, and the full set is available per meal.
How do I start?+
Pick three clients. Reply to the email your sample report came attached to, or write to us, and we will set those three up. Three is enough to see whether the weekly report changes a single check-in conversation, which is the only thing worth judging it on.
Pick three clients. See what you were missing.
Three is enough to know whether a weekly micronutrient readout changes a single check-in conversation. That is the only thing worth judging this on.
Free for you. No card. Your clients keep using the Açaí app they already have.